MedicalDevice Licensing.com
Pharmalicensing.com
Latest: Watch here for details of new products and services.
RSS Feeds
Advanced search

Login  Register

About Us
Pharmalicensing - Partnering solutions for the life sciences
 
Our Products
Overview
Partnering Search
Company Profiling
Deal Negotiation
PL Intelligence
Reports
Comparison
 
PL Intelligence
Overview
Industry news
Deals review
Press releases
Articles
 
Case Studies
See what others think about our service
 
Newsletter
Partnering update
Key reports
Subscribe
 
Quick Links
Profile now
Register now
Profiled companies
Featured events
Industry news
PR Newswire
Jobs
 
Contact Pharmalicensing
Send an email
Call us: +44 1904 520460
Request a callback
 
RSS Feeds
Keep up to date

Pharmalicensing
is a division of
UTEK Europe Ltd
UTEK Corporation
PR Newswire

Drink-Drive Cambridgeshire Vet Warned as to Future Conduct

— LONDON, September 21

LONDON, September 21 /PRNewswire/ -- Following a two-year postponed judgment, the Disciplinary Committee (DC) of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons last week [17 September 2009] warned a Cambridgeshire veterinary surgeon as to his future conduct, after he had been convicted in 2006 for causing death by careless driving whilst under the influence of alcohol.

In September 2007, the Committee heard that Peter Hanlon MRCVS, of Soham in Cambridgeshire, had been involved in a road traffic accident in February 2006. Mr Hanlon's car had drifted across the road and collided with an oncoming car driven by James Barber who was accompanied by his wife, Ivy. Mr Barber was pronounced dead at the scene and both Mrs Barber and Mr Hanlon sustained injuries.

At the initial hearing, Mr Hanlon admitted the conviction (for which he had been sentenced to 30 months in prison and received a four-year driving ban) and the charge that it rendered him unfit to practise veterinary surgery. The Committee decided to postpone its judgment for two years on the agreement that Mr Hanlon would undertake to abstain from alcohol and to submit quarterly medical reports and six-monthly CPD (continuing professional development) reports to the Committee chairman.

At the resumed hearing last week, the Committee carefully considered Mr Hanlon's written and oral submissions, and accepted that he had fully complied with these undertakings. He had abstained from alcohol since the day after the accident, produced an "exemplary" CPD record and provided impressive reports from his employers concerning his professional competence.

In addition, Mr Hanlon, who spent around 14 months in prison and remained on licence until July 2009, also reiterated to the Committee his remorse for the death of Mr Barber and respect for his family.

The Committee was mindful of its duty to maintain confidence in the veterinary profession and uphold proper standards of conduct. Whilst it did not consider it necessary to postpone judgment again, it felt that Mr Hanlon should be warned about his future conduct.

Caroline Freedman, chairing the Committee, concluded: "As this case has demonstrated, and as Mr Hanlon himself has fully recognised, abuse of alcohol can lead to far reaching consequences in personal and professional lives and the lives of others."

NOTES FOR EDITORS

1. The RCVS is the regulatory body for veterinary surgeons in the UK and deals with issues of professional misconduct, maintaining the register of veterinary surgeons eligible to practise in the UK and assuring standards of veterinary education.

2. RCVS disciplinary powers are exercised through the Preliminary Investigation and Disciplinary Committees, established in accordance with Schedule 2 to the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966 (the 1966 Act). The RCVS has authority to deal with three types of case:

a) Fraudulent registration

b) Criminal convictions

c) Allegations of disgraceful professional conduct

3. The Disciplinary Committee is a constituted judicial tribunal under the 1966 Act and follows rules of evidence similar to those used in a court of law.

4. The burden of proving an allegation falls upon the RCVS, and the RCVS must prove to the standard that the Committee is sure.

5. A respondent veterinary surgeon may appeal a Disciplinary Committee decision to the Privy Council within 28 days of the date of the decision. If no appeal is received, the Committee's judgment takes effect after this period.

6. It is a criminal offence contrary to section 19 of the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966 to practise as a veterinary surgeon unless registered in the RCVS Register of Members. Only those veterinary surgeons properly registered may practise veterinary surgery and use the postnominals MRCVS or FRCVS.

7. Further information, including the original inquiry into Mr Hanlon, and the Committee's findings and decision, can be found at http://www.rcvs.org.uk/disciplinary.

For more information please contact:

Ian Holloway, Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons +44(0)20-7202-0727, i.holloway@rcvs.org.uk

Related news

Clients in focus...

Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.

Partnering and licensing intelligence in life sciences industry
Press releases: Pharmalicensing current industry press releases.

© Copyright 1995-2009 Pharmalicensing, a division of UTEK Europe Ltd UTEK Corporation All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Contact us